Transactions on Machine Intelligence

Transactions on Machine Intelligence

Flood Routing Using the Muskingum-Cunge Method and Genetic Algorithm

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Madani University of Azerbaijan, Tabriz, Iran.
Abstract
Flooding remains one of the most catastrophic natural hazards, often causing widespread human casualties and extensive economic damage. Nonetheless, the severity of its consequences can be significantly mitigated through precise modeling, thorough analysis, and the implementation of effective flood management strategies. A deep understanding of flood behavior and trends is crucial for improving forecasting accuracy and enabling timely preventive actions in flood-prone areas. When integrated with early warning systems, flood control infrastructures, and coordinated emergency responses, reliable flood forecasting can dramatically reduce the risk to human life and infrastructure. This study adopts a documentary and library-based research methodology to gather and analyze relevant data, with the objective of enhancing the accuracy of flood modeling techniques. Specifically, the study evaluates the effectiveness of the Maskingham-Cunge method in conjunction with genetic algorithms for modeling flood behavior. The integration of these approaches allows for the dynamic adjustment of parameters, replacing static inputs with variable ones to better reflect real-world conditions. Additionally, incorporating one-dimensional kinematic wave theory to compute wave speed improves the precision of output hydrograph estimation. The findings demonstrate that this combined approach significantly enhances the predictive performance of flood models. As a result, it offers a robust tool for informed decision-making in flood management, contributing to more efficient disaster preparedness and risk reduction efforts in vulnerable regions.
Keywords

  • Zahiri, A. R., Asghari, S., & Dehghani, A. A. (2016). Trending of river floods by multi-interval Muskingum method. Journal Name, 4(1), 81–88.
  • Raisi, A., & Yazidi, S. (2021). Flood trending using multi-interval linear Muskingum method and sea hunters algorithm. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 52(10), 2693–2707.
  • Khalifa, S., Khodashenas, S. R., & Esmaili, K. (2021). Estimation of the nonlinear parameters of the Muskingum model in the flood trending model with the new dragonfly algorithm. Sharif Civil Engineering Journal, 2(37), 3–10.
  • Karimian, R., Hanrabakhsh, A., Sadatinejad, S. J., & Abdollahi, K. (2011). Flood trends in rivers using kinematic wave model and Muskingum-Cunge (Case study: Doab Samsami river). Iranian Water Research Journal, 6(10), 57–65.
  • Mohammadi Ghaleni, M., & Ebrahimi, K. (2013). Evaluation of direct search and genetic algorithms in optimization of Muskingum nonlinear model parameters—a flooding of Karoun River, Iran. Water and Irrigation Management, 2(2), 1–12. ut.ac.ir+3آکادمیا+3jwim.ut.ac.ir+3
  • Samani, H., Haghigi, A., & Farhadi, S. (2012). Flood hydrological trending using the linear Muskingum method in the system of multi-branch rivers with optimization by genetic algorithm. Scientific Research Journal, 8(1), [Page numbers].
  • Nowrozi, H., & Merchant, J. (2019). Investigating the selection of different trending parameters on the accuracy of flood trending in rivers using the Muskingum-Cunge method. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 1(14), 181–192.
  • Karimi, V. (2019). Investigating the accuracy of different flood forecasting methods in rivers using different hydrological methods (Master's thesis, Zanjan University).
  • Rezavandi, L. (2021). Investigating flood trends in prismatic composite channels with rough walls (Case study: Barandooz River-Sediqabad region) (Master's thesis, Urmia University).
  • Mirzazadeh, P. (2012). Investigating flood trending methods in reservoirs and rivers (Master's thesis, University of Sistan and Baluchestan).
  • Majidipour, A., & Efros, A. (2018). Approximate prediction of improvement of erosion and sedimentation pattern at the intersection of channels by optimizing geometric and hydraulic parameters with the help of genetic algorithm. Scientific and Specialized Journal of Water Engineering, 7(1), 61–82.
  • Maithami, A. (2011). Optimization of nonlinear Muskingum model parameters for flood trending using genetic algorithm (Master's thesis, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz).
  • Sarıgöl, M., & Yesilyurt, S. E. F. A. (2022). Flood routing calculation with ANN, SVM, GPR, and RTE methods. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 31(6), [Page numbers]. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/151542
  • Bharali, B., & Misra, U. K. (2022). Numerical approach for channel flood routing in an ungauged basin: A case study in Kulsi River Basin, India. Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 7(4), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-022-00149-w
  • Antwi-Agyakwa, K. T., Afenyo, M. K., & Angnuureng, D. B. (2023). Know to predict, forecast to warn: A review of flood risk prediction tools. Water, 15(3), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030427
  • Norouzi, H., & Bazargan, J. (2022). Flood routing using the Muskingum-Cunge method and application of different routing parameters. Sādhanā, 47(4), 282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-02049-0
  • Shayannejad, M., Akbari, N., & Askari, K. O. A. (2015). Determination of the nonlinear Muskingum model coefficients using genetic algorithm and numerical solution of the continuity equation. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 21(1), 1–14. org
  • Orouji, H., Bozorg Haddad, O., Fallah-Mehdipour, E., & Mariño, M. A. (2014). Flood routing in branched river by genetic programming. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management, 167(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.12.00006
  • Fevzi, O., & Safak, O. O. (2017). Flood routing model using genetic expression programming. In 7th International Scientific Forum, ISF 2017 (Vol. 2004, p. 481).
  • Prawira, D., Soeryantono, H., Anggraheni, E., & Sutjiningsih, D. (2019). Efficiency analysis of Muskingum-Cunge method and kinematic wave method on the stream routing (Case study: Upper Ciliwung watershed, Indonesia). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 669(1), 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/669/1/012036
  • Akbari, R., Hessami-Kermani, M. R., & Shojaee, S. (2020). Flood routing: Improving outflow using a new non-linear Muskingum model with four variable parameters coupled with PSO-GA algorithm. Water Resources Management, 34, 3291–3316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02613-5
  • Mirzazadeh, P., Akbari, G. H., & Ghodsi, M. (2022). Investigating Muskingum-Cunge method application of different schemes in flood routing. Journal of Hydrosciences and Environment, 6(11), 42–48.
  • Zucco, G., Tayfur, G., & Moramarco, T. (2015). Reverse flood routing in natural channels using genetic algorithm. Water Resources Management, 29, 4241–4267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1058-z
  • Azizipour, A., Kashefipour, S. M., & Haghighi, A. (2021). Reverse flood routing in an open channel using genetic algorithm. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202102.0364.v1
  • Barati, R., Akbari, G. H., & Rahimi, S. (2013). Flood routing of an unmanaged river basin using Muskingum–Cunge model; Field application and numerical experiments. Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2(6), 8–20.
  • Ponce, V. M. (2019). The Muskingum-Cunge method. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 24(10), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001842
Volume 5, Issue 4
Autumn 2022
Pages 222-230

  • Receive Date 14 July 2022
  • Revise Date 25 September 2022
  • Accept Date 02 December 2022