[1] A. Razmjoo, L.G. Kaigutha, M.V. Rad, M. Marzband, A. Davarpanah, M. Denai. A Technical analysis investigating energy sustainability utilizing reliable renewable energy sources to reduce CO2 emissions in a high potential area. Renewable Energy. 164 (2021) 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.042
[2] G. Srinivasan, P. Muthukumar. A review on solar greenhouse dryer: Design, thermal modelling, energy, economic and environmental aspects. Solar Energy. 229 (2021) 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.04.058
[3] S. Bilgen. Structure and environmental impact of global energy consumption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 38 (2014) 890-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.004
[4] M.A. Bagherian, K. Mehranzamir, A.B. Pour, S. Rezania, E. Taghavi, H. Nabipour-Afrouzi, et al. Classification and analysis of optimization techniques for integrated energy systems utilizing renewable energy sources: a review for CHP and CCHP systems. Processes. 9 (2021) 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020339
[5] K. Chen, M. Pan. Operation optimization of combined cooling, heating, and power superstructure system for satisfying demand fluctuation. Energy. 237 (2021) 121599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121599
[6] M. Rajabi, M. Mehrpooya, Z. Haibo, Z. Huang. Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review. Applied Energy. 253 (2019) 113544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113544
[7] D. Ma, L. Zhang, B. Sun. An interval scheduling method for the CCHP system containing renewable energy sources based on model predictive control. Energy. 236 (2021) 121418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121418
[8] J. Zhao, H. Chang, X. Luo, Z. Tu, S.H. Chan. A novel type of PEMFC-based CCHP system with independent control of refrigeration and dehumidification. Applied Thermal Engineering. 204 (2022) 117915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117915
[9] E. Ozden, I. Tari. PEM fuel cell degradation effects on the performance of a stand-alone solar energy system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 13217-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.017
[10] S. Kavian, C. Aghanajafi, H.J. Mosleh, A. Nazari, A. Nazari. Exergy, economic and environmental evaluation of an optimized hybrid photovoltaic-geothermal heat pump system. Applied Energy. 276 (2020) 115469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115469
[11] X. Wang, Y. Xu, Z. Fu, J. Guo, Z. Bao, W. Li, et al. A dynamic interactive optimization model of CCHP system involving demand-side and supply-side impacts of climate change. Part I: Methodology development. Energy Conversion and Management. 252 (2022) 115112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115112
[12] H.R. Takleh, V. Zare, F. Mohammadkhani, M. Sadeghiazad. Proposal and thermoeconomic assessment of an efficient booster-assisted CCHP system based on solar-geothermal energy. Energy. 246 (2022) 123360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123360
[13] F. Ren, Z. Wei, X. Zhai. Multi-objective optimization and evaluation of hybrid CCHP systems for different building types. Energy. 215 (2021) 119096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119096
[14] F. Musharavati, S. Khanmohammadi, A. Pakseresht. A novel multi-generation energy system based on geothermal energy source: Thermo-economic evaluation and optimization. Energy Conversion and Management. 230 (2021) 113829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113829
[15] N. Li, X. Zhao, X. Shi, Z. Pei, H. Mu, F. Taghizadeh-Hesary. Integrated energy systems with CCHP and hydrogen supply: A new outlet for curtailed wind power. Applied Energy. 303 (2021) 117619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117619
[16] F. Bernoosi, M.E. Nazari. Optimal sizing of hybrid PV/T-fuel cell CHP system using a heuristic optimization algorithm. 2019 International Power System Conference (PSC). IEEE2019. pp. 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/PSC49016.2019.9081541
[17] M. Hashemzehi, V. Pirouzfar, H. Nayebzadeh, C.H. Su. Modelling and optimization of main independent parameters for biodiesel production over a Cu0. 4Zn0. 6Al2O4 catalyst using an RSM method. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. 97 (2022) 111-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6916
[18] R. Ahmed, S. Mahadzir, N.E.M. Rozali, K. Biswas, F. Matovu, K. Ahmed. Artificial intelligence techniques in refrigeration system modelling and optimization: A multi-disciplinary review. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 47 (2021) 101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101488
[19] M. Kazemian, S.G. Nassab, E.J. Javaran. Comparative techno-economic investigation of CCHP combined by GSHP based on response surface methodology. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress. (2022) 101386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101386
[20] N. Mahdavi, P. Mojaver, S. Khalilarya. Multi-objective optimization of power, CO2 emission and exergy efficiency of a novel solar-assisted CCHP system using RSM and TOPSIS coupled method. Renewable Energy. 185 (2022) 506-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.078
[21] E. Saedpanah, H. Pasdarshahri. Performance assessment of hybrid desiccant air conditioning systems: A dynamic approach towards achieving optimum 3E solution across the lifespan. Energy. 234 (2021) 121151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121151
[22] R. Shrivastava, V. Kumar, S. Untawale. Modeling and simulation of solar water heater: A TRNSYS perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 67 (2017) 126-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.005
[23] G. A' lvarez, M. Chagolla, J. Xama' n, M. Jime' nez, S. Sua' rez, M. Heras. A TRNSYS Simulation and Experimental Comparison of the Thermal Behavior of a Building Located in Desert Climate. Energy Sustainability2010. pp. 349-56. https://doi.org/10.1115/ES2010-90272
[24] J.F. Kreider, F. Kreith. Solar energy handbook. (1981). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3266267
[25] W. Yaïci, E. Entchev, K. Lombardi. Experimental and simulation study on a solar domestic hot water system with flat-plate collectors for the Canadian climatic conditions. Energy Sustainability. American Society of Mechanical Engineers2012. pp. 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1115/ES2012-91295
[26] Y. Allard, M. Kummert, M. Bernier, A. Moreau. Intermodel comparison and experimental validation of electrical water heater models in TRNSYS. Proceedings of Building Simulation2011. pp. 688-95.
[27] D. Brough, J. Ramos, B. Delpech, H. Jouhara. Development and validation of a TRNSYS type to simulate heat pipe heat exchangers in transient applications of waste heat recovery. International Journal of Thermofluids. 9 (2021) 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2020.100056
[28] M. Rezvanpour, D. Borooghani, F. Torabi, M. Pazoki. Using CaCl2· 6H2O as a phase change material for thermo-regulation and enhancing photovoltaic panels' conversion efficiency: Experimental study and TRNSYS validation. Renewable Energy. 146 (2020) 1907-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.075
[29] S.A. Kalogirou, R. Agathokleous, G. Barone, A. Buonomano, C. Forzano, A. Palombo. Development and validation of a new TRNSYS Type for thermosiphon flat-plate solar thermal collectors: energy and economic optimization for hot water production in different climates. Renewable energy. 136 (2019) 632-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.086
[30] Y. Cao, H.A. Dhahad, H. Togun, A. El-Shafay, S. Alamri, A.A. Rajhi, et al. Development and transient performance analysis of a decentralized grid-connected smart energy system based on hybrid solar-geothermal resources; Techno-economic evaluation. Sustainable Cities and Society. 76 (2022) 103425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103425
[31] N. Sommerfeldt, P. Ollas. Reverse engineering prototype solar PV/thermal collector properties from empirical data for use in TRNSYS type 560. ISES Solar World Congress and IEA Solar Heating and Cooling Conference 2017, Abu Dhabi, UAE, October 29-November 2, 20172017. pp. 1121-32. https://doi.org/10.18086/swc.2017.18.11
[32] S. Klein, B. Newton, J. Thornton, D. Bradley, J. Mitchell, M. Kummert. TRNSYS Reference Manual: Mathematical Reference. (2006).
[33] E.E. Kahveci, I. Taymaz. Hydrogen PEMFC stack performance analysis through experimental study of operating parameters by using response surface methodology (RSM). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 47 (2022) 12293-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.119
[34] A.J. Santhosh, A.D. Tura, I.T. Jiregna, W.F. Gemechu, N. Ashok, M. Ponnusamy. Optimization of CNC turning parameters using face centred CCD approach in RSM and ANNgenetic algorithm for AISI 4340 alloy steel. Results in Engineering. 11 (2021) 100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100251
[35] R. Ghelich, M.R. Jahannama, H. Abdizadeh, F.S. Torknik, M.R. Vaezi. Central composite design (CCD)-Response surface methodology (RSM) of effective electrospinning parameters on PVP-B-Hf hybrid nanofibrous composites for synthesis of HfB2-based composite nanofibers. Composites Part B: Engineering. 166 (2019) 527-41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.094
[36] Stat-Ease, Inc. (2021). Design-Expert® software (Version 13.0.5) [Computer software]. Minneapolis, MN: Stat-Ease, Inc.
